“… Anonymity is very different from privacy. Walking the streets, you’re not in private, but you may be anonymous if no one recognizes you. If you go into a store and pay cash for a book, what you’re doing isn’t private, but, again, you may be anonymous, and that anonymity might be very important to you. When people post material on a freely accessible Web site, their postings are public, not private — but they may well be anonymous. In such contexts, the question is not whether privacy should be honored but whether anonymity should be protected.”
Jed Rubenfeld, professor of constitutional law at Yale Law School
vara bungas: Profesors teicami nodefinēja, ka anonimitāte nav tas pats, kas privātums un nav ar to vienādi aizsargājama. Rakstā ir arī citas vērtīgas atziņas. Ceru tas ļaus no cita skata punkta paraudzīties uz mūsu diskusiju šeit
vara bungas 