[..] NATO leadership is considering the creation of two new commands. The first command would focus on logistics and how to quickly move troops and materiel around Europe in case of a conflict. The second would be charged with protecting the sea lanes in the Arctic and the Atlantic, a major concern given Russia’s emphasis on rebuilding its submarine fleet. [..]
[..] The oceanic-focused command will likely find support in two key NATO allies. Officials from Norway and the U.K. have been particularly alarmed by Russia’s activities in the upper Atlantic, with Norwegian officials privately pushing for the creation of a NATO command to handle the issue.[..]
vara bungas: Kreņķu ap Arktiku un krievu A2/AD sistēmas efekta mazināšanas pasākumi. Kā arī tika paredzēts. Manāmi, ka norvēģi ir pamatīgi norūpējušies.
Kas attiecas uz citādi nekādi savlacīgi neatrisināmām loģistikas problēmām šķiet ir pienācis laiks jautāt sabiedrotajiem:
” Dear friends, just because we are totally behind the schedule and because we are closest state to the FEBA would you lend (or lease) us full set of armament and equipment for two mechanised infantry brigades? In return we will provide infrastructure, proper maintenance for vehicles and systems, trained crews and high readiness troops. Please. Sincerely yours VB”
būtu godīgs darījums, jo visus nepieciešamos dzelžus pērkot nenopirksim, bet pēdējais ar ko citas valstis vēlētos mūs atbalstīt ir šo valstu karavīri ierakumos (mūsējo vietā).
Par pēdējo rindkopu piekrītu par visiem miljons procentiem!