avots: flickr.com/photos/latvijas_armija
VB: Notikusi SzS Kbr štāba sertifikācija atbilstoši Combat Readiness Evaluation (CREVAL) prasībām. Labs sākums, noteikti nebija viegls (piemērs). Jāturpina ar visu sauszemes spēku vienību un apakšvienību sertifikāciju. ZS bataljonu HQ un apakšvienības nav izņēmums.
Vēl par CREVAL:
[..] 7.7 ACO Combat Readiness Evaluation (CREVAL) (Evaluation of Land Forces)
a. The ACO CREVAL programme for Land HQ and units is described in ACO Forces Standards, Vol VII. The aim of a CREVAL is to evaluate and verify the combat readiness of Land HQ and units in accordance to their Readiness Category (RC).
b. Nations will select and schedule their units for evaluation ensuring unit awareness of the specific requirements for their RC. Such a selection is to be carried out in coordination with the appropriate NCS/NFS HQs or GRF (L) HQ.
c. Unit evaluations will be conducted by national teams or, in the case of multinational units, formations by evaluation teams from the sponsor or lead nation. NATO monitors and observers will be present.
d. In line with the new Alliance strategy, each unit to be evaluated must demonstrate its combat readiness.
(1) For HQ evaluations, SHAPE, in consultation with the appropriate national authorities, will designate the HQ to be evaluated.
(2) In the case of national formation HQ, the appropriate nation will take the lead in the selection process. HQ evaluations will be conducted by Evaluation Teams, and will be monitored and observed by appropriate bodies. Further responsibilities are depicted in ACO AFS Vol. VII.
e. CREVAL represents SACEUR’s operational tool to evaluate the capability and combat readiness of the available HQ and forces. The ACO Forces Standards, Vol VII, lays down a general base of criteria for readiness, which apply to all FDC HQs within the CREVAL Programme.
f. Nations volunteer to participate in the CREVAL programme; for NRF HQ and units, CREVAL is the primary tool for evaluation and certification.
g. CREVAL programme does not require the mobilisation of reservists, recall of personnel from courses or leave, activation of equipment from deep preservation or the movement of supplies.[..]
a. The ACO CREVAL programme for Land HQ and units is described in ACO Forces Standards, Vol VII. The aim of a CREVAL is to evaluate and verify the combat readiness of Land HQ and units in accordance to their Readiness Category (RC).
b. Nations will select and schedule their units for evaluation ensuring unit awareness of the specific requirements for their RC. Such a selection is to be carried out in coordination with the appropriate NCS/NFS HQs or GRF (L) HQ.
c. Unit evaluations will be conducted by national teams or, in the case of multinational units, formations by evaluation teams from the sponsor or lead nation. NATO monitors and observers will be present.
d. In line with the new Alliance strategy, each unit to be evaluated must demonstrate its combat readiness.
(1) For HQ evaluations, SHAPE, in consultation with the appropriate national authorities, will designate the HQ to be evaluated.
(2) In the case of national formation HQ, the appropriate nation will take the lead in the selection process. HQ evaluations will be conducted by Evaluation Teams, and will be monitored and observed by appropriate bodies. Further responsibilities are depicted in ACO AFS Vol. VII.
e. CREVAL represents SACEUR’s operational tool to evaluate the capability and combat readiness of the available HQ and forces. The ACO Forces Standards, Vol VII, lays down a general base of criteria for readiness, which apply to all FDC HQs within the CREVAL Programme.
f. Nations volunteer to participate in the CREVAL programme; for NRF HQ and units, CREVAL is the primary tool for evaluation and certification.
g. CREVAL programme does not require the mobilisation of reservists, recall of personnel from courses or leave, activation of equipment from deep preservation or the movement of supplies.[..]
vara bungas 
nezinu pēc kādiem standartiem, bet mūsu batiņu pārbaudīja- tagad gaidam rezultātu. bet kā runāja, tad taktiskais izpildījums ir bijis ļoti labs. ja K kungs stāsta, ka ZS vienības ir tikko sertificētas un kaujas spējīgas, tad zinat, ka tas varētu būt par mums! kaut vienības lielumu neatklāšu!- iespējams, ka aiz valsts noslēpuma, bet varbūt aiz kauna!.. 😀
Ja vērtēšanas komisija nav starptautiska, tas viss iekšējai lietošanai. Bet vienalga liels solis uz priekšu, Graubes laikā nevienam i prātā nenāca mērīt ZS vienību spējas, jo šausmas, kas varētu atklāties.
Es domāju, ka ne Graube, ne Kalniņš te ņe pričom, atnāca pendelis no augšas un viss.
Iespraudīšu kārtējo sveci pie “Dievišķā ziemeļatlantijas pendeļa” altāra.
+
nezinu par komisiju, bet mana “kantora” vingrinājumam, katram vadam līdzi nāca divi sveštautiešu novērotāji. Tā kā nav nemaz tik traki.
Novērotāju novērojumus apspriedāt?
Jā. Bet tikai vada līmenī. Puikas analizēja mūsu vienības darbības. Kopskats ir zvaigžņoto līmenis. Un mirstīgajiem, diemžēl, netiek atklāts..
tad viss ok