Dienas grauds

vara bungas: Žēl, ka šajā rakstā  nav pateikts,  kurš ir tas vai tie Baltijas valstu līderi, kas pieļauj zibenskaru. Tomēr secinājums, ka zibenskarš ir bīstamākais, bet vienlaicīgi  arī mazāk iespējamais scenārijs, ir pareizs.  Ar vārdu feckless (lacking initiative or strength of character; irresponsible) autors  visticamāk domāja lēmumu pieņemšanu politiskajā līmenī. Tā kā, ja sekojam šim pieņēmumam, politiskā neizlēmība un alianses saišu vājināšanās var tuvināt mazāk iespējamo scenāriju.

P.S. Lower-end junitiem pastiprināti trenēt slazdus un mācīties sabotāžas principus🙂

” [..] “Our general assessment is we don’t believe, and many of the Baltic leaders don’t believe, that the Russians would make a land grab and sue for piece,” Flanagan added. “But they are opportunistic. If they think they can cause a crisis in NATO and make NATO look feckless or unable to respond quickly, that may be something they would risk.”[..] Higher-end equipment like MANPADS and ATGMs would be allocated to Baltic special operations forces who would be responsible for ambushing tanks, raiding enemy headquarters and rescuing captives. Lower-end units would be used to ambush convoys, raid less defended outposts and conduct sabotage.[..]”

avots

 

Komentēt

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Mainīt )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Mainīt )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Mainīt )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Mainīt )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.