Dienas grauds


vara bungas: kārtējais (jāsāk kolekcionēt) “kapitulantiskais” viedoklis nēbūt ne pro-kremliskajā, bet labējā izdevumā. Autors ir Russian studies departamenta direktors pieredzes bagātajā American Enterprise Institute domnīcā (anno 1938), ko finansē US konservarīvie sponsori. Vēršu uzmanību uz komentāriem par rakstu. Ne mazāk interesanti.

[..] Yet a tripwire is effective only in so far as the tripper believes that touching it would cause an explosion, and there are good reasons to suspect that to Putin, the tripwire looks disconnected from the powder keg.[..] And then there is Putin’s largest built-in advantage over democracies: Above all, they want peace. He needs victory.[..]

avots

Viena doma par “Dienas grauds

  1. konservatīvie izrādās lielāki russlandversteher nekā demokrāti. autors vispār netver laukumu – salkanie stāsti par Putinu, kurš industriju atgriezis valsts rokās… ja valsts domāts putina špana, tad taisnība. Autors – nošaujams retards.

Atbildēt

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com logotips

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Mainīt )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Mainīt )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Mainīt )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Mainīt )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.