vara bungas: Tas ir tikai viedoklis pagaidām. Bet ņemot vērā izdevumu izskatās pēc gatavināšanas.
[..] North America and Europe will potentially face the most dramatic shifts in U.S. force structure and posture. Building a Golden Dome and accelerating nuclear modernization will consume vast resources. Increasing U.S. shipbuilding, aircraft and munitions production will further add to the bill. Moreover, using conventional ground and special operations capabilities along the southern border will create more costs and readiness issues. Europe is likely where these trade-offs will be felt most.
European states and NATO should prepare for the U.S. military to act as an enabler rather than core provider of the bulk of any combat force. The United States can and should provide capabilities that European states will struggle to produce. Examples include command and control, space and cyber capabilities and bomber aircraft. However, Europe should expect to carry the burden for less unique military requirements, especially land combat roles.How this logic may translate to changes in American force posture in Europe is unclear, but experience from the last Trump administration suggests that some forces, especially land forces, may either withdraw from Europe or move out of Germany and Italy to posts farther east. [..]
Uz kopējā fona man nav pozitīvas sajūtas – sākot no SAB priekšnieka 30 gadu uzrunas noslēguma, beidzot ar Krievijas pārtraukumu maksāt saviem pensionāriem pensijas Latvijā. Tik daudzi sīki indikatori visapkārt, ka jāpriecājas kamēr vēl iespēja dota. Sajūtiski mums gads, divi max.