Formulas taisīšana


vara bungas:  Labs kopsavilkums par drošības situāciju Baltijas jūras reģionā un ES no Ziemeļvalstu perspektīvas. Autors arī runā pr plāniem B un C, kuru esamība pati no sevis  var glābt plānu A, jo skaidrs, ka plāns D jau ir un tas ir karš. Te gan jāsaka, ka  SE un FI gadījumā plāns A ir nenoteiktāks par mūsējo A. Ja šobrīd diskusija notiek vai un kā NATO aizstāvēs savējos, tad diskusijas par to vai NATO aizstāvēs neitrālos nav vispār. No tā izriet plāns B neitralitāti mīlošiem ziemeļniekiem – sajūtot sviluma smaku, ātri un bez referendumiem stāties NATO, līguma melnrakstu sagatavot savlaicīgi.

[..] This deterioration of security in Europe makes it urgent for countries like the Nordic and Baltic states to review what can be done so that Plan A, the current order, can survive despite what is happening, but also to seriously have an idea of a ​​Plan B and Plan C.

Conditions for their implementation in a crisis situation need to be created well before they are desperately needed. Also, planning for B and C will raise awareness and could perhaps even save Plan A at the same time.

But you can probably forget about hearing presidents, prime ministers, and foreign ministers discussing Plans B and C in public.”

avots

Komentēt

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com logotips

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Mainīt )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Mainīt )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Mainīt )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Mainīt )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.