vara bungas: Poļu vienkāršota IPB analīze (2016.) par Suvalku koridoru. Apvidus piemērots aizardzībai un ir elle uzbrūkošiem kājniekiem. Tomēr dīvaini, ka autori nemaz neanalizē situāciju, kad abi galvenie ceļi uz LT var tikt nosegti ar artilērijas uguni no RU un BY teritorijas, pretinieka kājniekiem nemaz nešķērsojot valsts robežu (kā 2014.-2015.gadā, kad Donbasā RU artilērija darbojās no RU teritorijas). Lemšana par atbildes uguni tad būs nebanāls uzdevums PL politiķiem.
[..] It is important to note that, in the case of such aggression, not only the Suwalki Gap would be seized. Moreover,
part of Polish territory towards the west – Warmia and Masuria Voivodeship – some 100 kilometres deep, would probably be occupied for freedom of maneuvre and for pushing NATO’s long range weapon systems out to deny endangering Kaliningrad
and military units’ assembly areas. [..]
vara bungas 
Banāls uzdevums – ja kaut kas lido uz mums, tad pretī lidos tikpat un vairāk. Te labi noderēs Bairaktāri un Spike NLOS – precīzi atbildes triecieni pa ienaidnieka artilēriju. Ja vēl nesaprot, tad Precision struke missile. Pa radariem, lidlaukiem un kuģiem 500km apkārtnē.
Var būt tāpēc arī neanalizē tādu situāciju, ka dos bietē un tas ir pašsaprotami. Ne velti BS palielina līdz 300 tūkst.
16.gads.
Attiecīgi 2016. gadā poļi pieņēma Krab haubici, bet 2017. gadā izlēma iepirkt HIMARS, turpinot programmu ar pašu versijas (Homar) ražošanu. Precīzus triecienus sauszemē var veikt arī NASAMS pretkuģu raķetes (termogrāfiskajai galvai uzdotais mērķa veidols var būt jebkurš). Krievu ĀM jau vaidēja par ugrozu.
The warhead on NASAMS missiles would be pretty useless against most targets and the cost of using it for such targets is nonsensical.
The need for rocket artillery seems more and more evident in the Baltics. It would be essential for suppressing enemy air-defence assets (among other supporting units), which would enable achieving air dominance in the region. Without controlling the air, it will be extremely difficult to defend.
You can see the basic tactics of defence in this video:
My “typo”, I meant NSM of course. It is actually a tactical cruise missile able to hit anything with known shape.
We need some long range precision missile with anti-radiation (ARM) un anti EW capability. Russian EW devices are large and with powerful radiation signature. It is easy to guide by radiation.
They are working on it.https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/40733/land-based-strike-version-of-navys-long-range-air-defense-blasting-missile-breaks-cover
Put them in standard containers and carry them from place to place with a civilian lorry. Stop-sites – country houses that are not visible from other houses or roads. There you can do maintenance, personnel replacement and recreation. In this way, enemy will not be able to destroy the launch facilities in the first few minutes of the war. At the beginning of the war, the first salvo to known places. After reloading and changing position – the second salvo after receiving updated info from satellites, radars, unmanned aircrafts etc.
No šī viedokļa reāli ir interesantas tās sistēmas, kuras uzreiz tiek konstruētas standarta konteineru gabarītos un piemērotas atbilstošam transportam. Piemēram DĀR zenītraķešu sistēma Umkhonto un Izraēlas taktisko raķešu sistēma Lora.
Umkhonto konteiners vispār ir autonoms un varot strādāt neapkalpojams, saņemot komandas no vadības punkta.