Slidkalniņš

vara bungas: VB vienmēr atbalstīja viedokli, ka LV kā subarktiska piekrastes teritorija ļoti interesē RU un tās sāncenšus. Mums jāapzinās savu ģeostratēģisko vērtību un jāpārdodas pēc iespējas dārgāk. RU viss ir gatavs, lai šantažētu potenciālos Ziemeļu jūras ceļa brauktgrībētājus un caur to regulētu arī Arktiskā dzelzceļa un RailBaltica attīstību.  Līdzās lielvalstu ekonomiskām interesēm nāk drošības un aizsardzības problēmas.  Ne tikai RU, tagad arī  CN ir viena no tām. Par to un dauz ko citu FI valdības apmaksātā pētījumā pēc hipersaites zemāk.

 

[..] The potential of the Arctic railway — as a part of the Arctic transit corridor — depends to a great extent on China (alongside other Asian actors), namely, choices made by Chinese shipping companies, Russian and Chinese political focus on the NSR, and trade volumes between China and Northern Europe. Equally, the feasibility of an Arctic railway for container shipping depends on appropriate connections to Germany, as Chinese imports to Germany would need to constitute a vast majority of container shipping transported by rail (Kirkenes Nearingshage, 2018, p. 29). Therefore, the completion of Rail Baltica and the highly challenging Helsinki-Tallinn tunnel (currently in the early conceptual stage, envisaged –ambitiously – to be built by 2035) might prove crucial for the Arctic railway to become economically feasible in terms of East Asia-Europe transit. [..]

 

avots (teksts ENG no 11 lpp)

 

vēl

Komentēt

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Mainīt )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Mainīt )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Mainīt )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Mainīt )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.