[..] Nākamajā rītā pēc atgriešanās Latvijā no pirmās vizītes Ukrainā bērnu namā ieradusies Drošības policija (tagad – Valsts drošības dienests). Ņikita ticis aizturēts un nogādāts Drošības policijā, kur esot ticis nopratināts – ko esot darījis Ukrainā? Vai esot tur karojis? Vai pazīstot kādu no AZOV pulka vai kā citādi esot ar viņiem saistīts?
“Tieši šis moments, kad es atgriezos no atpūtas Ukrainā un mani aizturēja, bija galvenais iemesls tam, ka es uzreiz pēc Drošības policijas atbrīvošanas sakravāju savas mantas un devos atpakaļ uz Ukrainu [..]
VB: 2017.gadā dalība karadarbībā UA, (jebkurā pusē) bija krimināli sodāma. VB ieraksts 2015.gads
vara bungas 
Drošības dienestiem atšķirībā no mentenes būtu jāprot interpretēt likumus un kaut ko neredzēt.
Savākt bērnu no bērnu nama bez aizbildņa klātbūtnes nemaz nedrīkst
Estonian volunteers in Ukraine may also get questioned by the Estonian ISS, but generally they just try to make sure that you didn’t commit any crimes there etc. If you aren’t stupid and don’t publish incriminating evidence about your activities there, then they don’t really care. Publicly the state discourages going to a war zone, but the institutions will mostly turn a blind eye. Socially it is acceptable to participate on the side of Ukraine.
We did have an incident, where a local pro-russian politician went to Donbass with the help of some shady Russian NGO. He is currently detained, along with several other people who he was involved with.
Questioning isn’t an issue. Problem is that according with latvian law at that time, someone could be punished regardless of which side he choose. In theory of course, but anyway you have to think twice.
Seems like the law was just a political overreaction then.
just as always. First maximum delay, then overreaction.
He was living in orphanage, so likely under 18 and constantly bullied by vatnik classmates and even more vatnik teachers.
And then on top comes the caring state in form of security police.
I wonder how he still identifies with Latvia